In The Press: Bloomberg Law turns to partner Charles Macedo for insight on Patent Losers Piggyback on Supreme Court Constitutionality Review

https://www.bna.com/patent-losers-piggyback-n73014462637/ “The downside of asking additional questions is that your petition may just be denied because of the additional questions,” said patent litigator Charles R. Macedo, a partner at Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP, New York. “The advantage in only asking the same question as Oil States is that the petition will likely be held in abeyance […]

In The Press:
2017 New York Metro Super Lawyers Names Nine Attorneys From The Firm For Intellectual Property, Intellectual Property Litigation and Alternative Dispute Resolution and Three Attorneys as Rising Stars

Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP is pleased to announce that 2017 New York Metro Super Lawyer Magazine has named nine of its Attorneys including:   Partners:   Daniel S. Ebenstein  Intellectual Property  Selected to Super Lawyers 2006, 2013 – 2017   Anthony F. Lo Cicero  Intellectual Property  Selected to Super Lawyers 2007 – 2017   Charles […]

In The Press:IAM Reports on NATURE published paper “Differing Diagnoses for European and US Patents by Alan Miller, Ph.D and Brian Amos Ph.D

IAM Reported: http://www.iam-media.com/blog/Detail.aspx?g=41096dda-df0d-4467-a046-b05bcfdc490e   Adding to that growing discrepancy between the US and other major patent jurisdictions, a more recent paper from two private practice lawyers found that the Supreme Court’s decision in Mayo v Prometheus is having a significant effect on applications for medical diagnostic patents. The authors, Brian Amos and Alan Miller. from Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein, looked […]

In The Press:
Bloomberg Law turns to partner Charles Macedo for insight on Patent Losers Piggyback on Supreme Court Constitutionality Review

https://www.bna.com/patent-losers-piggyback-n73014462637/ “The downside of asking additional questions is that your petition may just be denied because of the additional questions,” said patent litigator Charles R. Macedo, a partner at Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP, New York. “The advantage in only asking the same question as Oil States is that the petition will likely be held in abeyance […]

We Need High Court Guidance On ‘Abstract Idea’

Law360, New York (May 4, 2017, 11:11 AM EDT) —   Charles Macedo Sandra Hudak In Bilski v. Kappos, 561 U.S. 593 (2010), the U.S. Supreme Court was faced with the challenge of defining the law of patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101 for the first time since the early 1980s. The Supreme Court held that the […]