In The Press:Askeladden Advocates against Tribal Sovereign Immunity in Patent Review Proceedings
New York, NY – Askeladden filed an amicus curiae brief on Friday that presents arguments opposing the Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe’s motion to dismiss a series of inter partes reviews (IPRs) of Restasis® patents. The Tribe invoked Tribal Sovereign Immunity as a basis for its motion. Available Here:
Exploring Viability Of ‘Diagnose And Treat’ Method Claims
Law360’s Expert Analysis Exploring Viability Of ‘Diagnose And Treat’ Method Claims The enforceability of single claims that cover the steps of both diagnosing and treating a patient is discussed in view of Cleveland Clinic Foundationv. True Health Diagnostics LLC[1], which held that the claims in U.S. Patent No. 9,170,260[2] were not infringed under either contributory infringement or […]
In The Press:
IPWatchdog Turns To Partner Charles R. Macedo For His Insight Into SCOTUS Decision in Oil States v. Green Energy
Industry Reaction to Supreme Court Decision in Oil States v. Green EnergyBy Gene Quinn & Renee C. Quinn on Apr 24, 2018 06:17 pm Earlier today the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Oil States v. Green Energy, finding that inter partes review is constitutional both under Article III and the Seventh Amendment to […]
Brief Of Askeladden LLC as Amicus Curiae In Opposition To St. Regis Mohawk Tribe’s Motion To Dismiss in Mylan Pharmaceuticals inc. v. St. Regis Mohawk Tribe, IPR2016-01127, -01128, -01129, -01130, -01131, -01132 (PTAB Dec. 1, 2017)
Click to download PDF: Brief Of Askeladden LLC As amicus Curiae In Opposition To St. Regis Mohawk Tribe’s Motion To Dismiss
In The Press:
PTAB Denies St. Regis Mohawk Tribe’s Request for Sovereign Immunity in Challenges of Restasis Patents
Askeladden filed an amicus brief arguing against applicability of tribal sovereign immunity in IPR proceedings. Patent Quality Initiative mentions Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP in report on recent PTAB decision denying sovereign immunity claims of St. Regis Mohawk Tribe on Restasis Patents. Partner Charles R. Macedo, Senior Counsel Mark Berkowitz and Associate Sandra Hudak represented Askeladden LLC […]
In The Press:
Askeladden Petitions for Review of Digital Verification Systems Patent
Argues that prior art renders all claims anticipated or obvious. Patent Quality Initiative mentions Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP in report on recent IPR filings made by the firm on behalf of Askeladden LLP against Patent Owner Digital Verification System, for U.S. Patent No. 9,054,860. Partner Charles R. Macedo is lead counsel and Senior Counsel Mark […]
The Trademark Lawyer, October 2017:Requirement of Use in the USA
Max Vern from Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP explores the practical aspects of Use Requirements in American trademark practice.
In The Press:
Askeladden Advocates against Tribal Sovereign Immunity in Patent Review Proceedings
New York, NY – Askeladden filed an amicus curiae brief on Friday that presents arguments opposing the Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe’s motion to dismiss a series of inter partes reviews (IPRs) of Restasis® patents. The Tribe invoked Tribal Sovereign Immunity as a basis for its motion.
In The Press:Law360 Turns to Partner Charles R. Macedo for Thoughts On Biggest Open Questions in Trademark Law Analysis
The Biggest Open Questions In Trademark Law, Part 1 By Bill Donahue How Do You Protect Marijuana Marks? *** “Now that many states have legalized marijuana, will the PTO adapt its rules to allow for federal registrations?” asked Charles R. Macedo, a partner at Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP. Available at […]
In The Press:
Amici Request SCOTUS Intervention to Protect Against Extra-Statutory Application of Patent Eligibility Challenges in Court
On November 21, 2017, amici Network-1 Technologies, Inc. (“Network-1”), Mirror Worlds Technologies, LLC (“MW”), Broadband iTV, Inc. (“BBiTV”), Island Intellectual Property, LLC (“IslandIP”), Double Rock Corporation (“Double Rock”), and Access Control Advantage, Inc. (“ACA”) (collectively “Amici Curiae”) filed an brief in support of RPost’s petition for a writ of certiorari in RPost Communs. Ltd. v. GoDady.com, […]