Charles R. Macedo advises and litigates in all areas of intellectual property law, including patent, trademark and copyright law, with a special emphasis in complex litigation. He also assists clients in obtaining, maintaining and enforcing patent and trademark portfolios. He has successfully recovered domain names registered to others using clients’ trademarks.
Mr. Macedo is the author of The Corporate Insider's Guide to U.S. Patent Practice, published by Oxford University Press and is frequently published by the Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, IP Law 360, and other publications. Mr. Macedo has been cited as an authority on intellectual property issues by various news media including the Wall Street Journal, Dow Jones, BNA, Bloomberg, Inside Counsel, Managing Intellectual Property, Technology Transfer Tactics.
Identifying vulnerabilities and considering variations on design concepts, Mr. Macedo can develop patent strategies intended to maximize patent protection and prevent infringement challenges from arising in the future. He has represented clients in intellectual property litigation and other types of matters involving a wide range of subject matter including photomasks, angular rate sensors, methods of taking checks over the telephone, financial service products, internet websites, inventory control systems, cosmetics, nickel metal hydride batteries, wind mills, nuclear waste disposal, green house gasses reclamation, cell phones, fax machines, answering machines, telephone switching equipment, inflatable chairs, money market mutual funds, deposit sweep programs, designer handbags, apparel, cathode ray tube displays, projectors, DRAM, semiconductor chips, to name a few.
In the internet, computer and business related invention arena, even before the State Street case was decided, Mr. Macedo successfully defended the Discover Card division of Morgan, Stanley from charges of patent infringement and obtained a summary judgment of noninfringement. Mr. Macedo also acts as regular intellectual property counsel to Double Rock Corporation and its related entities. Mr. Macedo was principal attorney on amicus submissions in Bilski v. Doll to the U.S. Supreme Court and In re Bilski to the U.S. Court of Appeals to the Federal Circuit. He is frequently consulted on developing effective patent strategies for computer implemented and business related inventions for financial service companies, Software-As-A-Service providers and clients with other internet and computer based inventions.
In the field of trademarks, Mr. Macedo has enforced and defended against trademark assertions involving a wide range of products and services including financial service providers, non-profit organizations, cosmetic companies, luxury retailers of designer handbags, and department store house brands.
He was the sole law clerk to Hon. Daniel M. Friedman of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 1989 - 1990.
He has published papers, and lectures on various topics and has been the recipient of the prestigious AIPLA Robert C. Watson Award.
Mr. Macedo holds bachelors and masters degrees in physics from The Catholic University of America and a law degree from Columbia Law School, both of which he graduated with honors.
ARELaw Alerts
-
ARE Patent Law Alert:
Overview of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Patents
September 13, 2011
-
ARE Patent Litigation Alert:
NYIPLA Files Amicus Brief in Mayo v. Prometheus
September 8, 2011
-
ARE Patent Litigation Alert:
Federal Circuit—Applying Section 101 as a “Coarse Filter”— Confirms the Patent Eligibility of Some But Not All Claims In Classen Remand
September 1, 2011
-
ARE Patent Litigation Alert:
US Supreme Court Grants Cert for the Second Time in Prometheus v. Mayo Case on Patent-Eligible Subject Matter
June 21, 2011
-
ARE Litigation Alert:
U.S. Supreme Court Confirms “Clear and Convincing” Evidence Standard Applies to Validity Challenges for Patents
June 9, 2011
-
ARE Patent Litigation Alert:
U.S. Supreme Court find Bayh-Doyle Act Does Not Override Employees' Rights to Unassigned Inventions
June 7, 2011
-
ARE Patent Litigation Alert:
U.S. Supreme Court Addresses Knowledge Element of Claims for Inducing Patent Infringement
June 1, 2011
-
ARE Patent Litigation Alert:
Federal Circuit Takes A Second Divided Infringement Case En Banc
May 27, 2011
-
ARE Patent Litigation Alert:
Federal Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Another False Marking Case and Clarifies Meaning of “Patented Article”
May 2, 2011
-
ARE Patent Litigation Alert:
Federal Circuit Takes On Divided Infringement Issue
April 22, 2011
-
ARE Patent Law Alert:
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Publishes Supplementary Guidelines For Determining Compliance With 35 U.S.C. 112
February 11, 2011
-
ARE Patent Litigation Alert:
Federal Circuit Turns Its Attention to Natural Phenomena Under 35 U.S.C. § 101
December 17, 2010
-
ARE Patent Litigation Alert:
Federal Circuit Provides Other Limiting Criteria on “Abstract” Subject Matter Under Section 101
December 8, 2010
-
ARE Patent Litigation Alert:
U.S. Supreme Court Agrees to Address Law on Presumption of Patent Validity
November 29, 2010
-
ARE Patent Law Alert:
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Provides Notice of New Guidelines For The Obviousness Inquiry Based on Post-KSR Case Law Development
September 8, 2010
-
ARE Patent Law Alert:
Patent Misuse Defense Limited by the Federal Circuit Sitting En Banc
September 8, 2010
-
ARE Patent Law Alert:
"Any" Person Has Standing For False Marking Claim
September 7, 2010
-
ARE Patent Law Alert:
U.S. Supreme Court Affirms Bilski, But Sets The Course Clear For Business Methods Patents
June 28, 2010
-
ARE Patent Law Alert:
The Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office Declines to Provide Whether Further Guidance on the Patentability of Computer-Implemented Inventions Under the European Patent Convention
May 18, 2010
-
ARE Patent Law Alert:
TiVo v. EchoStar: Federal Circuit Revising The Standard for Contempt of Injunction En Banc
May 14, 2010
-
ARE Patent Law Alert:
Supreme Court to Decide Whether Foreign Sale Exhuasts Copyrights
April 23, 2010
-
ARE Trademark Law Alert:
Second Circuit Decides Tiffany v. eBay Appeal
April 1, 2010
-
ARE Patent Law Alert:
Tafas v. Doll Round IV: Down For The Count
October 8, 2009
-
ARE Patent Litigation Alert:
U.S. Government Files Brief in Bilski v. Kappos
September 26, 2009
-
ARE Patent Law Alert:
Prometheus Labs v. Mayo Clinic: Federal Circuit Applies Transformation Prong of In re Bilski Test and Finds Drug Usage Method Claim to be Patentable Subject Matter Under Section 101
September 17, 2009
-
ARE Patent Law Alert:
How the Supreme Court Should Resolve Bilski v. Doll
July 20, 2009
-
ARE Patent Law Alert:
Rehearing En Banc Granted in Tafas v. Doll
July 8, 2009
-
ARE Patent Law Alert:
Supreme Court Grants Cert For In re Bilski
June 1, 2009
-
ARE Patent Law Alert:
Tafas v. Doll – Round II: One Down, Three to Go
March 23, 2009
-
ARE Patent Law Alert:
Bilski: The Court Announces Machine or Transformation Test as “Governing” Test
October 30, 2008
Published Articles
-
Brief in Opposition "Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. and Kimberly-Clark Global Sales, LLC, Petitioners, v. First Quality Baby Products, LLC and First Quality Retail Sercvices, LLC, Respondents, (December 30, 2011)"
January 3, 2012
-
’Clear and convincing‘ evidence standard still applies to US patent validity challenges
Microsoft Corp. v i4i L.P., 131 S. Ct. 2238, US Supreme Court, 9 June 2011
-
Bilski v Kappos: a year in review
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2011, 1 of 7
-
Bayh–Doyle Act does not override employees' rights to unassigned inventions
August 17, 2011
-
US reissue procedure can fix failure to include dependent claims
– Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2011
-
Intent must be pleaded with particularity for false marking claim in use
– Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2011
-
A Comprehensive and Extensive Collection of Legal Principles on Patent Opinions Under US Patent Laws
– Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2011
-
Second Circuit Confirms Insurance Company Did Not Have Duty To Defend Action Based on Intellectual Property - Related Claims Under Personal Injury and Advertising Injury Clauses
April 4, 2011
-
Patentee Losing Claim Construction Does Not Make Infringement Case ‘Exceptional’
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, March 31, 2011
-
‘Abstract Idea’ Exception to Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Clarified
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, March 15, 2011
-
Introducing New Evidence in Patent Appeals from USPTO
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, January 28, 2011
-
Personal Jurisdiction and the Improper Service of Process
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, January 19, 2011
-
Chippendales’ ‘Cuffs & Collar’ Mark Not Inherently Distinctive
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 22 December 2010
-
‘ANY’ Person Has Standing for False Marking Claim in Use
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, November 11, 2010
-
US Federal Circuit Narrows Patent Misuse Doctrine as a Defence to Patent Infringement
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, November 1, 2010
-
"America Thrives on Competition; Barbie … will too"
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, November 1, 2010
-
A Primer On Spotting IP Issues Associated with Social Media Websites and Content
- Intellectual Property Watch, October 30, 2010
-
US Supreme Court Returns Patent-Eligibility Test to Fundamental Principles
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, September 21, 2010
-
Same Word, Different Meanings
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, August 19, 2010
-
Tips For Drafting And Prosecuting Patent Applications After Bilski v. Kappos, 561 U.S. ___ (2010)
- Technology Transfer Tactics, August 2010, pp. 123-24
-
Nine Opportunities for Federal Circuit Guidance on Patents Post-Bilski
- Weblog entry, Legal Pulse, 26 Jul 2010
-
The Nuts And Bolts Of The Bilski Decision
- IP Law360, June 30, 2010
-
Us Trademark Owners Must Police Their Own Marks On eBay
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, June 4, 2010
-
US BPAI Sets Forth Ground Rules for Patent Prosecution and Appeals
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, May 10, 2010
-
The Impact Of American Needle On IP And Contracts
- IP Law360, May 26, 2010
-
Conviction For Selling Admittedly ‘Not Authentic’ Purses at a ‘Purse Party’ Overturned
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, April 7, 2010
-
The 2nd Circ. Stance On Tiffany V. eBay
- IP Law360, April 6, 2010
-
XML Feature in Microsoft Word Permanently Enjoined in US Patent Case
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, March 24, 2010
-
Waiting for Bilski
- IP Law360, February 1, 2010
-
Mattress.com Mark Upheld as Generic
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, January 28, 2010
-
Summary Judgment on Violation of NDA Barred by Material Facts in Dispute
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, January 25, 2010
-
Failure to Plead Originality of Copyright Design is Fatal to Complaint
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, January 8, 2010
-
Federal Circuit Reminds US BPAI of Fundamentals
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, December 9, 2009
-
Joint Authorship of Doo-Wop Song Found Based on Disputed 10 Percent Contribution to Lyrics
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, November 1, 2009
-
How The “Machine-Or-Transformation” Test In Bilski Is Failing
- Intellectual Property Watch October 16, 2009
-
Sloppy Dismissal Orders Lead to Confusion
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, September 14, 2009
-
Infringement Of Product-By-Process Claims In US Clarified
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, July 28, 2009
-
How The Supreme Court Should Resolve Bilski
- IP Law360, July 20, 2009
-
Patent Assignment Found Ambiguous as a Result of Too Much Specificity
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, July 5, 2009
-
Tafas v. Doll – Round II: One Down, Three to Go
- IP Law360, March 24, 2009
-
Secondary Meaning Must be Attributed to Business to Afford Trademark Protection Under US Law
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, May 20, 2009
-
Secondary Considerations of Non-Obviousness Must Still Be Considered
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, April 17, 2009
-
Permanent Injunction Affirmed in US Patent Case
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, March 19, 2009
-
New Test for Design Patent Infringement in the USA Eliminates Separate ‘Point of Novelty’ Inquiry
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, March 12, 2009
-
Processes Must Be Tied to Machine or Transformation Matter to be Patent-Eligible in the United States
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, January 27, 2009
-
Copying Of Open Source Software In Violation Of Artistic Licence Was Not Licensed
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, December 19, 2008
-
Seeking Patent Protection for Business-Related and Computer-Related Inventions After Bilski
- CELESQ®-WEST IP Master Series, November 17, 2008
-
The "Machine-Or-Transformation Test" For Processes
- IP Law360, October 30, 2008
-
Duty on Trademark Owner to Police Its Own Marks
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice: Current Intelligence, October 21, 2008
-
Egyptian Goddess v. Swisa: Revising The Test
- IP Law360, September 23, 2008
-
eBay: A Tale of Two Defenses
- IP Law360, August 22, 2008, Guest Column, 2008
-
Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc.: Guidelines for Online Retailers to Police Third Party Sales of Counterfeit Goods
- Common Law Journal, July 29, 2008
-
High Court Sets Patent Exhaustion Law Back On Track
- IP Law360, July 10, 2008
-
The Boundaries Of Patent-Eligible Processes In Bilski
- IP Law360, May 09, 2008
-
In re Bilski Roll Call and Score Card
- IP Law360, Financial Services Law360, Technology Law360, April 23, 2008
-
Tafas Verdict Is A Setback For Patent Office
- IP Law360, April 9, 2008
-
Will The High Court Clarify The Exhaustion Doctrine?
- IP Law360, January 16, 2008
-
Reviving The Exhaustion Doctrine
- IP Law360, January 10, 2008
-
Patentable Subject Matter: Refining the Boundaries
- IP Law360, November 02, 2007
-
Infringement Assertions In The New World Order
IP Law360, October 17, 2007, Guest Column
-
New PTO Rules on Continuing Applications and Claim examination Practice: Learning to Count to 2 (+1 RCE) and 5/25
- NYIPLA Bulletin, September/October, 2007
-
KSR v. Teleflex, Redefining The Obvious
- IP Law360, May 3, 2007
-
Using Intellectual Property to Protect Your Web Site
- IP Law360, May 2, 2007
-
Courts Write History on Permanent Injunctions In Patent Actions
- IP Law360, August 22, 2006, Guest Column
-
Rethinking Claim Construction
- IP Law360, April 25, 2006
-
Drafting Joint Research Agreements Under The Create Act Of 2004
- Portfolio Media, New York (March 2, 2005)
In The Press
-
In the Press:
Technology Transfer reports on ARELAW Alert
October 5, 2011
-
In The Press:
JIPLP reviews The Corporate Insider's Guide to U.S. Patent Practice
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, June 20, 2011
-
In the Press:
Mobile Marketer turns to partner Charles Macedo for his thoughts on the strategy behind Apple's patent infringement lawsuit against Samsung over mobile phone technology.
April 22, 2011
-
In The Press:
IP Law 360 turns to Partner Charles R. Macedo For Insight on TiVo v. Echostar Oral Arguments Before the Federal Circuit
- Ryan Davis, IP Law360, Monday, November 15, 2010
-
In The Press:
Inside Counsel Turns to Partner Charles R. Macedo for Insight on TiVO v. Echostar Case
- Inside Counsel, Steven Seidenberg, August 1, 2010
-
In The Press:
Technology Transfer Tactics turns to Partner Charles R. Macedo for insight on Bilski decision.
- Bilski Decision Leaves Many Questions Unanswered for TTOs, Technology Transfer Tactics, July 2010
-
In The Press:
The Heshel School Builds its Portfolio of Intellectual Property
- Heschel School News, September 17, 2009
-
In The Press:
The Heshel School Project
- Heschel School News, May 29, 2008
-
In The Press:
New York Court to Weigh Tiffany v. eBay’s Effect on Web Service’s Contributory Liability
- Reproduced with permission from BNA's Electronic Commerce & Law Report, Vol. 13, No. 42 (Oct. 29, 2008) pp. 1382-1383. Copyright 2008 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) www.bna.com
-
In The Press:
Patent Law Pending
- Joe Palazzolo. Law.com, Monday, February 25, 2008
-
In The Press:
Federal Circuit To Mull Patents' Scope In Bilski Case
- Elizabeth Landau, IP Law360, Tuesday, Feb 19, 2008
Speaking Engagements
-
October 18, 2011
13th Annual VBA Corporate Counsel Fall Forum
Location: Omni Richmond Hotel, Richmond, VA
-
October 14, 2011
Patent Reform: Impact and Strategy for University Research and Tech Transfer
Location: Technology Transfer Tactics Webinar Workshop
-
September 8, 2011
Drafting Patents in a WYDIWYG World
Location: Live Webinar
-
July 27, 2011 – July 28, 2011
8th Annual Patents for Financial Services Industry
Location: New York, NY
-
July 21, 2011 – July 24, 2011
121st Summer Meeting of the Virginia Bar Association
Location: The Homestead - Hot Springs, Virginia
-
May 24, 2011 – May 25, 2011
3rd Annual Corporate Intellectual Property Counsel Forum
Location: New York, NY
-
February 7, 2011
Monetization of Your Invention Using IP
Location:
-
January 25, 2011
Understanding Obviousness in a Post-KSR World: Practical Applications for Compliance with the Recent USPTO Guidelines
Location: Webinar
-
November 15, 2010 – November 16, 2010
World Research Group The TechNet Patents Forum
Location: New York, NY
-
November 8, 2010 – November 9, 2010
World Research Group The TechNet Patents Forum
Location: New York, NY
-
November 3, 2010
Social Media East: Risks and Rewards 2010 Conference
Location: New York, NY
-
September 30, 2010
Virtual Corporate Counsel Forum: Selecting the Right Fee Arrangement (CLE Eligible)
Location: Webcast
-
September 17, 2010
Bilski: The Impact of the Final Decision on University TTOs
Location: Audioconference
-
July 27, 2010 – July 28, 2010
World Research Group 7th Annual Patents & The Financial Services Industry
Location: Westin at Times Square, New York, NY
-
June 30, 2010
Beyond Bilski: The Future of Patent-Eligible Processes
Location: Webcast
-
April 27, 2010 – April 28, 2010
World Research Group Second Annual Corporate IP Counsel Summit
Location: The New York Helmsley Hotel, New York, NY
-
March 10, 2010
2010 CLO Leadership Forum
Location: New York, NY
-
November 5, 2009 – November 6, 2009
World Research Group's Patents & the Technology & Internet Industries
Location: New York, NY
-
October 12, 2009 – October 14, 2009
Catalyzing Commercializtion of University-Based Inventions, AdvaMed 2009
Location: Washington, D.C.
-
July 28, 2009 – July 29, 2009
World Research Group's 6th Annual Patents & The Financial Services Industry
Location: New York, NY
-
April 29, 2009 – April 30, 2009
Corporate IP Counsel Summit
Location: New York, NY
-
November 17, 2008
Celesq®-West IP Master Series: Seeking Patent Protection for Business-Related and Computer-Related Inventions after Bilski
Location: Webcast
-
September 19, 2008
Patent Protection For Software-Related and Business-Related Inventions in Europe and the United States, Management Forum, Co. UK
Location: The Rembrandt Hotel, London, U.K.
-
July 29, 2008 – July 30, 2008
World Research Group’s Fifth Annual Patenting Your Business Methods in the Financial Services Industry Conference
Location: New York, NY