Brief for Amicus Curiae Askeladden L.L.C. in Support of Appellant’s Petition for Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc in JTEKT Corp. v. GKN Automotive, Ltd., No. 2017-1828 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 18, 2018)
Click to download PDF: Brief of Amicus Curiae Askeladden L.L.C. IN Support of Appellant’s Petition for Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc
The NYIPLA Report:
Recent Developments in Patent Law at the U.S. Supreme Court: OIL STATES, SAS INSTITUTE, and WESTERNGECO
In The Press: Law360 Reports on NYIPLA Amicus Brief Submited to SCOTUS By Firm Regarding Standing of Disasstified Petitioners In An IPR To Appeal An Adverse Ruling
IP Law360, July 23, 2018 Law360 Reports on NYIPLA Amicus Brief Submited to SCOTUS By Firm Regarding Standing of Disasstified Petitioners In An IPR To Appeal An Adverse Ruling (July 23, 2018, Law360) Law 360 Reported on amicus brief filing on behalf of NYIPLA by Partner Charles R. Macedo (as counsel of record and […]
Brief of NYIPLA as Amicus Curiae in Support of Neither Party in JTEKT Corp. v. GKN Automotive, Ltd., No. 2017-1828 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 18, 2018)
Click to download PDF: Brief of New York Intellectual Property Law Association as Amicus Curiae in Support of Neither Party
NYIPLA Files Amicus Brief Advocating for the Supreme Court to Clarify Article III Standing in Appeal from IPR Proceedings
(July 23, 2018, IPWatchdog) On Friday, July 20, 2018, the New York Intellectual Property Association (“NYIPLA”) filed an amicus brief arguing that the Petition for Writ of Certiorari should be granted in RPX Corp. v. ChanBond LLC, No. 17-1686. See the NYIPLA’s website for the full Brief of New York Intellectual Property Law Association as […]
US Supreme Court determines that PTAB must issue a final written decision addressing all challenged claims in inter partes reviews
– Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, jpy092, doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpy092 Abstract SAS Institute Inc v Iancu, No 16–969, US Supreme Court, 24 April 2018 In SAS Institute Incv Iancu, the Supreme Court of the USAissued a 5–4 opinion that reversed the decision of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and held that ‘the […]
CONGRATULATIONS TO THREE FIRM PARTNERS LISTED IN 2018 Leaders LeagueJune 2018
Congratulations to Partners Daniel Ebenstein, Holly Pekowsky and Max Vern on being listed in the 2018 Leaders League Innovation – Technology & Intellectual Property including: Partner Holly Pekowsky for being Excellent for Trademark Prosecution in New York City. Partners Daniel Ebenstein and Max Vern for being Highly Recommended for Trademark Litigation in USA and New […]
ARE Patent Law Alert:USPTO GUIDANCE ON SUBJECT MATTER ELIGIBILITY OF METHOD OF TREATMENT CLAIMS
On April 13, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) affirmed the district court’s ruling that the claims at issue in Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. West-Ward Pharmaceuticals, 887 F.3d 1117 (Fed. Cir. 2018), were patent eligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101. In a 2-1 split decision, the Court held that […]
In The Press:NYIPLA Participates in 2018 PTAB Judicial Conference in Alexandria, Virginia
On June 28, 2018, the USPTO hosted its 2018 PTAB Judicial Conference in Alexandria, Virginia. This was the first in a series of Judicial Conferences being hosted throughout the country. The NYIPLA was honored to participate in the conference with Charley Macedo, from Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP, co-chair of the newly created PTAB Committee […]
ARE Patent Law Alert:SCOTUS AUTHORIZES FOREIGN LOST PROFITS FOR DOMESTIC INFRINGEMENT UNDER 35 USC 271(f)(2) IN WESTERNGECO v. ION
(June 25, 2018) On June 22, 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States delivered an opinion in WesternGeco LLC v. ION Geophysical Corp., No. 16-1011, slip op. (U.S. June 22, 2018), addressing the question of whether a patent owner who proves infringement under 35 U.S.C § 271(f)(2) can recover lost foreign profits pursuant to […]