Charles Macedo and David Goldberg Co-Author Article For Oxford University Press’s Journal Of Intellectual Property Law & Practice on Round-up of US copyright

– Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, jpy129, https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpac025 Extract Charles Macedo and David Goldberg authored a brief in Google v. Oracle for the New York Intellectual Property Law Association in an amicus brief in Support of Neither Party, filed in the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. I. IntroductionLast year, we […]

Charley Macedo Publishes Updated Practical Law Practice Note on Understanding PTAB Trials: Key Milestones in IPR, PGR and CBM Proceedings

This Practical Law Practice Note by Charley Macedo discusses key milestones in post-grant patentability challenges at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). It reviews typical timelines and procedures at key milestones in inter partes review (IPR), post-grant review (PGR) and covered business method (CBM) patentability challenges before the […]

Charley Macedo and Co-Panelists from the 2020 LES USA and Canada Annual Meeting Publish Article in LES Nouvelles on How to Identify, Prepare And Package Data For Monetization in AI

Charley Macedo and his virtual co-panelists from the 2020 Licensing Executives Society (LES) USA and Canada Annual Meeting published an article in the September issue of LES Nouvelles on their conference topic, "How to Identify, Prepare And Package Data For Monetization in AI." The article provides an overview on how organizations can prepare and package […]

Charley Macedo and Chris Lisiewski Speak at the NYIPLA PTAB Committee on Unresolved and Open Issues in Arthrex

Today, New York Intellectual Property Law Association (NYIPLA) PTAB Committee co-chairs Charley Macedo (from Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein) and Ken Adamo and other members of the PTAB Committee, including ARE Law associate Christopher Lisiewski discussed open and unresolved issues after the Supreme Court’s June Arthrex decision.   Specifically, in its decision, the Supreme Court held […]

Charles Macedo and David Goldberg Co-Author Article For Oxford University Press’s Journal Of Intellectual Property Law & Practice on the US Supreme Courts finding authority held by administrative patent judges to be unconstitutional

Charles Macedo and David Goldberg co-authored an article for Oxford University Press’s Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice on the US Supreme Courts finding authority held by administrative patent judges to be unconstitutional. United States v Arthrex, Inc., Nos. 19-1434, 19-1452, 19-1458, 594 US ____, slip opinion, United States Supreme Court, 21 June 2021 (Arthrex […]

The NYIPLA PTAB Committee and Young Lawyers Committee to Examine the New Director Review Process After Arthrex and Appeals of Patent Trial and Board Final Written Decisions After Arthrex at August 3 Meeting

Join the New York Intellectual Property Law Association (NYIPLA) PTAB Committee and Young Lawyers Committee on August 3 as a follow up to last month’s webinar on Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Trial Milestones and examine the new Director Review process after Arthrex and Appeals of Patent Trial and Board Final Written Decisions After […]

Patent Law Alert: Supreme Court Upholds Assignor Estoppel Doctrine But Narrows Its Scope

On June 29, 2021, in Minerva Surgical, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the doctrine of assignor estoppel (which prevents inventors from challenging the validity of patents that they have assigned to third parties) as a defense in patent infringement cases, but limited the doctrine to apply only when the assignor’s claim […]

ARE PTAB Alert: SCOTUS Holds Appointment of PTAB APJs Unconstitutional But Remedies Situation by Giving Director More Control

On June 21, 2021, in United States v. Arthrex, Inc., Chief Justice Roberts writing the opinion for the U.S. Supreme Court confirmed that although the “unreviewable authority wielded by [Administrative Patent Judges (“APJs”)] during inter partes review is incompatible with their appointment by the Secretary of Commerce to an inferior office” giving the Director of […]