In The Press:
IPWATCHDOG turns to Partner Charles R. Macedo for his insights on the resignation of Michelle Lee as USPTO Director
Industry Reaction to the Resignation of USPTO Director Michelle Lee By Gene QuinnCharles Macedo Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP Michelle Lee was in charge of the US Patent and Trademark Office during tumultuous times. She inherited the Office after the departure of a very popular and successful administrator and his protégé. She was charged with numerous […]
Patently-O Reports on Amicus Brief Submitted by Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein on Behalf of the NYIPLA in Oracle
(February 20, 2017) Patently-O today mentions an Amicus Brief submitted by attorneys including Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein’s Charles R. Macedo and Annemarie Hassett on behalf of the New York Intellectual Property Law Association in Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc., Nos. 2017-1118, -1202 (Fed. Cir.). In this case, the United States Court of Appeals for […]
In The Press:
IAM Reports on NATURE published paper “Differing Diagnoses for European and US Patents by Alan Miller, Ph.D and Brian Amos Ph.D
IAM Reported:
In The Press: Askeladden LLC Announces Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP Seeks Inter Partes Review Of Encoditech Patent On It’s Behalf
Askeladden Seeks Inter Partes Review of Encoditech Patent Asserted in More than Thirty Lawsuits Asserts that claimed systems and methods for secure mobile communications were known and obvious Download PDF of Press Release New York, NY – Askeladden LLC, as part of its Patent Quality Initiative, filed a petition for Inter Partes Review (IPR) […]
In The Press:
IPLaw360 Reports On Amicus Briefs Supporting Petition For Certiorari Filed By Charles R. Macedo And Sandra A. Hudak At The Firm
Law360 reported on two amicus briefs filed by Jawbone and US Inventor (on behalf of several inventors’ groups) in support of the petition for a writ of certiorari that partner Charles R. Macedo and associate Sandra A. Hudak of Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP filed on behalf of Broadband iTV, Inc. Justices Urged To Define […]
In The Press:Askeladden LLC Announces Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP Filed IPR On Its Behalf Against Verify Smart
Askeladden Urges Review of Verify Smart’s Patent Related to Identity Verification in Electronic Transactions Seeks cancellation of all claims in view of known authentication and verification technologies Download PDF of Press Release Askeladden LLC, as part of its Patent Quality Initiative, is challenging the validity of U.S. Patent No. 8,285,648 which Verify Smart […]
In The Press:
IP Watch Reports on US, EU Diverge On Medical Diagnostic Patents
10/05/2017 BY KIM TREANOR FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY WATCH LEAVE A COMMENT Share this Story: IP-Watch is a non-profit independent news service, and depends on subscriptions. To access all of our content, please subscribe now. You may also offer additional support with your subscription, or donate. A recent article in the journal Nature Biotechnology finds that since a key United […]
In Practice: CORPORATE-LEGAL-DEPARTMENTS, Drafting Guide – Practical Guidance: Non-Disclosure and Confidentiality
Practical Guidance: Non-Disclosure and Confidentiality Agreements Purpose: This Practical Guidance discusses key issues that should be considered in drafting confidentiality agreements in view of the Defense Against Trade Secrets Act of 2016. It identifies key clauses typically included in such agreements and provides guidance on considerations in drafting clause. The guidance was authored by attorneys Charles R. […]
In The Press:
LAW360 REPORTS ON IPR INSTITUTION DECISION IN FAVOR OF FIRM’S CLIENT ASKELADDEN LLC AGAINST N5 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Law360 reported on an institution decision in favor of the firm’s client Askeladden LLC by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) in an inter partes review proceeding filed by partner Charles R. Macedo and senior counsel Mark Berkowitz of Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP. Askeladden Wins PTAB Review Of User Authentication Patent (Subscription […]
Patent Law Alert: Supreme Court Clarifies Lost Profit Remedy for Design Patent Infringement in Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Apple, Inc.
On December 6, 2016, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Apple Inc., unanimously reversing the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s decision which affirmed the award to Apple of $399 million in damages for Samsung’s design patent infringement — the entire profit Samsung made […]