In The Press: IPWatchdog Provides Arthrex Update including Summary Of NYIPLA Amicus Brief Prepared By Partner Charles R. Macedo and Associate David Goldberg

IPWatchdog issued an Arthrex Update on January 9, 2020 including a summary of the amicus brief prepared by partner Charles R. Macedo and associate David Goldberg for the New York Intellectual Property Law Association. NYIPLA’s amicus brief argues that the Federal Circuit should grant en banc rehearing and adopt the formulation of the issues in […]

In The Press:Managing IP Reports on Comments by Partner Charles R. Macedo

Managing IP Reports on Comments by Partner Charles R. Macedo from Protecting Innovations in the Financial Services Industry conference in New York Section 101 uncertainty not stopping patent filing: financial companiesPublished 25 July 2019  (Last Updated 25 July 2019)Author: Patrick Wingrove Managing IP reports: Charley Macedo, partner at Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein, pointed out that […]

ARE Patent Law Alert:The US Supreme Court Holds that the USPTO Cannot Be Reimbursed for Salaries of Its Legal Personnel in Appeals Under § 145 of the Patent Act

Supreme Court of the United States unanimously held in Peter v. NantKwest, Inc. that the term “expenses” in 35 U.S.C. § 145 does not include attorney’s fees, and that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) cannot recover the salaries of its attorneys and paralegals in appeals brought under that section of the Patent […]

In The Press: US Supreme Court hears argument on whether Patent Office can collect employees’ salaries in defending district court actions

Los Angeles & San Fransico’s Daily Journal (October 9, 2019) — publishes Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein’s Charles Macedo, Christopher Lisiewski and Chandler Sturm’s article on the Supreme Court Hearing Whether Patent Office Can Collect Employees’ Salaries In Defending District Court Actions – Even When The Patent Office Is Wrong. The latest term of the Supreme […]