In The Press:
Bloomberg Law turns to partner Charles Macedo for insight on Patent Losers Piggyback on Supreme Court Constitutionality Review

https://www.bna.com/patent-losers-piggyback-n73014462637/ “The downside of asking additional questions is that your petition may just be denied because of the additional questions,” said patent litigator Charles R. Macedo, a partner at Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP, New York. “The advantage in only asking the same question as Oil States is that the petition will likely be held in abeyance […]

We Need High Court Guidance On ‘Abstract Idea’

Law360, New York (May 4, 2017, 11:11 AM EDT) —   Charles Macedo Sandra Hudak In Bilski v. Kappos, 561 U.S. 593 (2010), the U.S. Supreme Court was faced with the challenge of defining the law of patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101 for the first time since the early 1980s. The Supreme Court held that the […]