IP-Watch Inside Views:
Rethinking Article III Standing In IPR Appeals At The Federal Circuit (US)
June 18, 2018
Author(s):
Charles R. Macedo, Chandler Strum, Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP, James Howard, Askeladden L.L.C.
In January 2018, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in RPX Corp. v. Chanbond LLC issued a non-precedential order dismissing an appeal by RPX (as a dissatisfied petitioner) of an adverse final written decision in an inter partes review (“IPR”) proceeding initiated in response to RPX’s petition. In particular, by applying is prior precedential decisions in Consumer Watchdog v. Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, and Phigenix Inc. v. Immunogen, Inc., the court concluded “that RPX lacks Article III standing to appeal the Board’s decision affirming the patentability of claims 1-31 of the ’822 patent.”
View all Published Articles
Upcoming Events
-
April 23, 2024 – April 24, 2024
Research & Innovation in Healthcare 2024 ConferenceLocation: Baylor Scott & White Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas (Registration Required)Speaker(s): Charles R. Macedo,
-
April 30, 2024 – May 2, 2024
AUTM Canadian Region Meeting 2024Location: Doubletree by Hilton Toronto Downtown, Toronto, Ontario (Registration Required)Speaker(s): Charles R. Macedo,
RSS FEED
Never miss another publication. Our RSS feed (what is RSS?) will inform you when new articles have been posted.
Subscribe now!